# STAGED Figma replies — Nabeel 8/4 comments (NOT POSTED, Chris to review)

File So6x1riO6XKjxXMxDMH0Gb, node 2066:2 unless noted. One reply per comment id.

**1871014697 (anchor CTA to card bottom)**
Done. Card links are bottom anchored across the board now, so the CTA sits in the same spot on every card.

**1871015496 (cards consistent size)**
Done. All the treatment cards are locked to equal width and height now, including the short one in the last row.

**1871016100 (empty space vs section above)**
Fixed. That gap was two stacked section paddings on the same background. Trimmed it so the rhythm matches the rest of the page.

**1871022545 (numbers superscript style)**
You're right, fixed. The footnote numbers in the disclaimer list render as true superscripts now, matching the markers up in the card copy.

**1871039162 (star rating as a range)**
Fair challenge. It now shows one number: 4.6 average across 6 nearby offices, weighted by their 2,860 reviews, the same math the scheduler pages use. The range was an early honesty hedge from before the per-office data was wired.

**1871094759 (extra spacing before the link)**
Done. The link gets clear space above it and anchors to the bottom of the card, so it reads as its own next step.

**1871099582 (number the visit sequence)**
Love this one. The visit walkthrough is now numbered 1, 2, 3 with step badges, so an anxious patient sees a mapped-out plan instead of a wall of reassurance.

**1871050442 (QR codes for desktop)**
Added. Desktop widths now show a QR next to the store badges that takes your phone straight to the install page. It hides on mobile, where you're already on the device.

**1871017329 (are these tags clickable?)**
They're labels, not links. I pulled them off the link color so they read plainly non-interactive now. If you'd rather see them flattened to plain text eyebrows instead of chips, easy change, your call.

**1871210296 (searchable insurance lookup)**
Agree on the confusion risk, and I like the searchable lookup direction. Holding this one because Rachel flagged all insurance and coverage language for legal review first. Once legal clears the framing we'll scope it.

**1871211443 (verify your coverage copy vs manual process)**
Agreed, the button and the copy next to it are telling two different stories. Holding under the same legal review flag on coverage language, and we'll reconcile both when legal signs off on what we can promise.

**1871676323 (pricing module / cost estimator)**
Agree cost anxiety is the big lever here. This one is a bigger scope and legal call on published pricing, so I'm not sneaking it into a fix pass. It's noted for the next scope conversation with Eric and Rachel.

**1871028302 (thread reply: change office from the card)**
Fair point, and noted. Letting you switch the office right from that hero card is on the UX list; today the change path lives on the locations page. The node reference was just a Figma pointer from an earlier note, ignore it.

**1871006456 (thread reply: brand photography exists in Brand Hub)**
Perfect, thank you. We'll pull hero photography from the Brand Hub set in the next imagery pass.
